Woobox Pricing: What Each Plan Includes
Woobox pricing runs from a free account with one live site through Basic, Pro, Ultra and Max, each paid tier raising monthly limits on sites, submits and views. The ladder is built on capacity rather than features: the campaign builder stays the same while live sites, submits and views expand step by step, and the free tier carries no credit-card requirement.
Prepared by ContestsOnline editorial desk — Revised
What each tier carries
Woobox pricing is built on capacity, and the ladder has five rungs: a free account, then Basic, Pro, Ultra and Max. Each step up adds more live sites and larger monthly counts of submits and views, while the campaign builder itself stays the same across the line. That shape matters for an organiser planning a contest, because the decision is not which features to unlock but how much traffic the campaign is expected to absorb. A short name-round poll with a few hundred entries and a season-long photo contest that stays public for months sit on different rungs by design.
The counts the vendor publishes are concrete. The free tier runs one live site with 100 submits and 1,000 views in a month. Basic keeps a single live site but lifts submits to 1,000 and views to 10,000. Pro raises the live-site count to 2, submits to 10,000 and views to 100,000. Ultra carries 10 live sites, 100,000 submits and 1,000,000 views. Max, the top rung, is built for high-volume teams: 20 live sites, 500,000 submits and 5,000,000 views a month.
Read as plans rather than as a menu, the tiers answer one question at a time. A single contest with modest traffic fits Basic. Two public campaigns, or one contest with a heavy gallery, need Pro. Agencies and teams running many client campaigns live together land on Ultra or Max, and the vendor's own labels follow that logic, from testing ideas through scaling e-commerce to enterprise volume.
- Submits and views are monthly figures, so a campaign that opens and closes inside one month draws against a single month's allowance.
- Live sites is the count of campaigns published at once, not a lifetime total.
- Because the builder is identical on every tier, a campaign can be drafted on the free account and moved upward without rebuilding.
Inside the free account
The free account is not a demo that expires. Woobox says it needs no credit card, and the help pages describe it as a standing way to build: unlimited sites can be set up in Admin-Only mode, campaigns can be created and customised in unpublished mode to preview and test before deciding on a subscription, and one site can even be published live each month. Some capabilities allow up to 100 participants for free, which sets the practical ceiling on what a no-cost contest can handle.
For a first contest, that combination covers the whole pre-launch phase. The organiser drafts the campaign, tests the entry flow, checks how the gallery and the voting options behave, and only then decides whether the traffic justifies a paid plan. The free plan and the paid tiers share the same editor, so nothing built at no cost has to be rebuilt after subscribing.
- No card details are taken at sign-up, so nothing bills while the account sits unused.
- The 100-participant allowance covers only some capabilities, and the pages do not list which ones tier by tier.
- Woobox never frames the free tier as a trial with an end date, so there is no countdown to beat.
Basic plan capacity and how it scales
The Basic plan accommodates 1 live site per month, in the vendor's own help-centre wording. For an organiser that means one campaign can be public at a time on this tier, though unpublished work can still be drafted alongside it. The pricing page pairs that single live site with 1,000 submits and 10,000 views per month, ten times the free account's allowance on both counts. Where the free tier is a workshop, Basic is the first tier that behaves like a running campaign with real traffic behind it.
The jump from Basic to Pro is the widest single step on the ladder. Pro adds a second live site, raises submits tenfold to 10,000 and views to 100,000. An organiser running simultaneous campaigns, one contest per region for instance, needs at least that step, since Basic's one live site cannot hold two public pages at once. Beyond Pro, Ultra and Max scale in the same direction: more simultaneous campaigns, and monthly counts measured in hundreds of thousands of submits and millions of views.
- Basic: 1 live site, 1,000 submits and 10,000 views per month.
- Pro: 2 live sites, 10,000 submits and 100,000 views per month.
- Ultra: 10 live sites, 100,000 submits and 1,000,000 views per month.
Coupons as a campaign type
Coupon is its own experience type on the platform, not a bolt-on to a contest. A coupon campaign distributes a code or voucher that the recipient redeems either in-store or online, and it is built from the Landing Pages template type rather than from a contest gallery. That separation matters when a brand wants to reward entrants: the coupon campaign is set up and published separately from the voting contest, and the two do not share a template.
Expiry is configured per voucher rather than per campaign. The organiser chooses whether vouchers expire on a specific date or after a relative number of days counted from when each voucher was awarded, which allows staggered validity: every winner's code lives for the same span regardless of when it was claimed. A code handed out in the first week and one handed out in the last week both carry the full validity window.
- A fixed expiry date suits a promotion with a hard end, such as a seasonal offer that closes on one day.
- A relative expiry in days suits rolling awards, where every code should last equally long from the moment it is handed out.
- Redemption is built into the voucher, so one setup serves both in-store and online use.
Fee changes and renewal notices
Two clauses in the vendor's terms govern what happens to pricing over time. Fees can change from time to time, but the terms promise at least 30 days' notice before any change takes effect. On top of that, a fee change is not applicable to the billing period in which the change occurs, so the current period is billed at the rate agreed when it began. Together those rules mean a subscription does not move under an organiser mid-cycle: the notice arrives first, and the new rate waits for a fresh period.
For budgeting a contest, the practical read is straightforward. The rate quoted when an organiser subscribes holds for at least the current billing period, and any increase is announced with a month's runway. The terms do not print renewal dates themselves; when a subscription renews is an account detail, visible to the account holder rather than published as a constant.
- Notice: at least 30 days before a fee change is implemented.
- Timing: a change never applies to the billing period in which it occurs.
- Budgeting: the rate at sign-up holds for the length of a billing period at minimum.
Voting options and their limits
Voting behaviour in a contest is governed by the voting options the organiser sets, and the classic photo or video contest template states its default plainly: users can vote once per submission. A participant can move through the gallery and vote for as many submissions as they like, but only one of their votes lands on any single entry. That combination, broad across the gallery and capped per submission, is the standard shape of a public vote and the one this template applies without extra configuration.
The pricing tiers do not change these rules. The per-submission cap and the gallery-wide freedom are campaign settings, not plan features, so the same voting options are available whether a contest runs on the free account or at the top of the ladder. What the tiers change is volume: how many participants can submit entries and how many views the page can carry in a month.
That distinction matters when an organiser compares plans. A higher tier does not relax the vote limit on an entry, and a lower tier does not tighten it. The limit lives in the campaign settings, and the organiser should read the voting documentation for the template in use rather than infer voting behaviour from the price of the plan underneath.
- The maximum per submission is one vote in the classic template.
- The gallery is open: a participant can vote on every submission they view.
- Tiers change volume, not voting rules; the same options sit on every plan.
Objections worth naming
Legality sits outside this ladder entirely. A pricing page and a plan table say nothing about whether a particular contest is lawful to run; that depends on the organiser's own rules, the prize and the jurisdictions involved, and no plan tier changes any of it. An organiser who needs that settled should read their own contest terms and local requirements rather than infer anything from where the campaign is hosted.
Disqualification and suspicious behaviour are campaign matters in the same way. The published voting options show the platform's built-in check, one vote per submission in the classic template, and the terms govern conduct around fees. Nothing in the pricing documentation addresses verification of votes beyond that, so an organiser worried about inflated counts should study the voting options and the contest's own published rules rather than assume a higher tier adds protection. It does not, on the evidence of the published material. The honest point is that the plan table is silent on fraud: no tier advertises stronger detection of manipulated votes, and none weaker. What the platform prints is the one-vote-per-submission default and whatever the organiser configures in the campaign itself.
- Legality: settled by the organiser's own rules and jurisdiction, never by a plan tier.
- Disqualification: governed by campaign rules and voting options, not by the price paid.
- Suspicious votes: addressed by the published voting checks, about which the pricing documentation is silent.
Where this summary stops
Three common questions cannot be settled from the vendor's published pricing material. How a receipt or invoice is issued after payment is not covered by the pages behind this summary. Nor is the process for transferring a subscription to a different user, which matters when an agency hands a finished campaign to a client or a colleague takes over an account. And the calendar of a subscription, including its renewal date, belongs to the account holder's settings rather than to any public page.
What the published material does settle is capacity, the coupon experience type, the behaviour of the free account and the notice period around fee changes. Everything else a reader needs, from billing documents to account handovers, runs through the vendor's own account support, and this summary would rather name the gap than paper over it.
- The receipt and invoice process is not covered by the material behind these rows.
- Transferring a subscription to a different user is not documented here and should be confirmed with the vendor.
- A subscription's exact renewal date is an account detail, not a published figure.
| Plan | Live sites | Submits per month | Views per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | one | 100 | 1,000 |
| Basic | one | 1,000 | 10,000 |
| Pro | two | 10,000 | 100,000 |
| Ultra | 10 | 100,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max | 20 | 500,000 | 5,000,000 |
Readers ask
What do I get with a free account?
One live site, 100 submits per month and 1,000 views per month, with no credit card required. The account also allows unlimited site setup in Admin-Only mode, unpublished campaigns for preview and testing before a subscription, and up to 100 participants for some capabilities.
How do I switch to a free account?
The vendor's help pages do not document a switch path between plans, and a summary should not invent one. What the pages do state is what the free account covers once it exists: Admin-Only building, unpublished testing, and one published live site per month. Confirm the switching steps with the account pages before cancelling a paid tier.
How many live sites can I have on a Basic plan?
One. The help centre states that the Basic plan accommodates 1 live site per month, paired with 1,000 submits and 10,000 views. Additional campaigns can be drafted in unpublished mode, but only one page can be public at a time on that tier.
How much does it cost to run a contest?
The cost depends on the tier, and the ladder is priced by capacity rather than by features. A free account carries one live site with small monthly caps, Basic keeps a single live site with a tenfold allowance, and Pro, Ultra and Max step up the sites, submits and views from there. The vendor prints the figures on its own pricing page.
When will my subscription renew?
The terms do not print renewal dates, and a subscription's anniversary is an account detail rather than a published constant. What the terms do settle is change: fees can change with at least 30 days' notice, and a change never applies to the billing period in which it occurs.
Can a coupon be distributed inside a campaign?
Yes. Coupon is its own experience type that distributes a code or voucher for redemption either in-store or online. It is built from the Landing Pages template, and each voucher can be set to expire on a fixed date or a relative number of days after it was awarded.
Notes and sources
- Woobox. woobox.com/pricing.
- Woobox. woobox.com/pricing.
- Woobox. woobox.com/pricing.
- Woobox. help.woobox.com/articles/what-do-i-get-with-the-free-account/.
- Woobox. woobox.com/sponsorterms.
This reference is published by the site's editorial team and gives no legal advice; it is not a substitute for a lawyer or for the vendor's own terms. It carries no prices, no fees and no currency figures, never quotes a rate, and cannot settle whether a contest is lawful, whether an entry will be disqualified, or how a subscription transfers between users. Figures shown are capacity limits from the vendor's published material, checked on 2026-10-02.
Woobox's user terms require entrants to agree to the organiser's official rules, so any limit on bought or incentivised votes depends on the particular contest. Walmart's Associate Talent Search rules prohibit paying for votes and let Walmart void fraudulent votes or disqualify the entrant. The platform's terms and the organiser's rules are two documents, and a disqualification is decided under the second.
Woobox lists three warning signs of bought votes: many votes from one IP address, votes from people in different countries and regular voting intervals. Award Force says its platform detects and blocks automated or scripted voting and rate-limits rapid voting. Ordinary participation is uneven in time and independent in origin, so it shows none of those patterns; this describes how checks read a count and is not a method for passing one.
In the United States, the FTC says a sweepstakes cannot require a purchase to enter, and California says a sweepstakes must offer a way to enter without cost. Those rules concern sweepstakes entry, not votes: whether a contest allows paid votes is written in its own rules, and ViralSweep even lets organisers configure Pay to Vote. Contests whose rules bar outside votes are refused, and so are political ballots.
Once voting closes, a refund applies where votes ordered for a contest never appear in the count the contest itself displays. ViralSweep says its protections may silently flag and block a vote, and Woobox says votes from IP addresses it has flagged as fraudulent do not count even when the voter appears to have succeeded, so the displayed count is the test. An organiser's ruling or a disqualification is never refunded, and neither is an account ban such as the permanent one Gleam says a breach of its terms may bring.